Energy Shock and Geopolitical Uncertainty Drive Market Volatility

March 16, 2026

Executive Summary

Financial markets continue to navigate an increasingly complex environment shaped by geopolitical risk, evolving inflation dynamics, and moderating economic growth. The escalation of the Iran war has introduced a significant energy-driven shock to global markets, pushing oil prices sharply higher. While the broader U.S. economy remains resilient, the combination of slowing momentum and the potential for energy-driven inflation is complicating the outlook for policymakers and investors alike.

For now, markets appear to be absorbing the geopolitical shock without a fundamental break in economic conditions. However, the outlook remains fluid, and the duration of the conflict – particularly its implications for global energy supply – will play a critical role in determining the path of inflation, interest rates, and financial markets in the months ahead.

Key Takeaways:

• Energy markets are the dominant macro driver. Oil prices surged above $115 before retreating toward the mid-$90 range, illustrating the market’s sensitivity to potential disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz.
• Economic growth is moderating but remains intact. Inflation data largely met expectations, consumer spending remains resilient, and labor market indicators continue to reflect a “low-hire, low-fire” environment.
• Energy-driven inflation risks are rising. Sustained higher oil prices could complicate the disinflation process and delay the Federal Reserve’s ability to cut interest rates.
• Monetary policy uncertainty has increased. Market expectations for rate cuts have shifted significantly, with futures now pricing the next reduction much later than previously anticipated.
• Markets remain highly sensitive to geopolitical developments. While financial markets have shown resilience so far, volatility is likely to persist as investors assess the duration of the Iran conflict and its implications for global growth.

Financial Markets

Financial markets navigated another week of the escalating Iran war with heightened volatility and limited clarity regarding the potential endgame. Investors were forced to assess not only the evolving geopolitical landscape but also the implications for global energy supply and inflation expectations.

Energy markets illustrated the extraordinary volatility of the past week. Crude oil prices initially surged to roughly $116 per barrel over the weekend as the conflict escalated but retreated sharply to approximately $93–$94 by Friday and remain near that level in early Monday trading. The retreat suggests that markets are still assigning a meaningful probability that supply disruptions will ultimately prove manageable.

Fixed income markets experienced similar volatility. The 10-year Treasury yield fell early in the week to approximately 4.09% before rising steadily to about 4.28% by week’s end, reflecting investor concern that sustained energy price increases could rekindle inflationary pressures. The policy-sensitive 2-year Treasury yield moved even more sharply, climbing from roughly 3.56% at the start of the week to a peak of 3.77% on Thursday, as expectations for near-term Federal Reserve rate cuts were pushed further into the future.

Beyond the geopolitical backdrop, investors continued to monitor developments in private credit markets. The Financial Times reported that individual investors have requested withdrawals exceeding $10 billion from several large private credit funds during the first quarter, with redemption requests expected to rise further in the coming weeks. Additional commentary from a senior Apollo executive raised questions about valuation marks within portions of the private credit market, though the firm later clarified that the comments were directed primarily toward software-related exposures. Importantly, while risks in private credit are growing, they do not currently appear systemic in nature.

Economics

Economic data released during the week presented a mixed but generally stable picture of the U.S. economy. February inflation largely matched expectations, with both headline and core CPI broadly unchanged from prior readings and core inflation holding near 2.5% year over year. Beneath the surface, tariff effects were visible in several goods categories, while core services inflation remained steady. Shelter costs, one of the largest components of CPI, continued to moderate, reinforcing expectations that housing inflation will gradually ease through the year and help offset pressures elsewhere. However, it’s worth noting that the report may already be somewhat outdated given the sharp rise in oil prices following the start of the Iran conflict, which could push headline inflation higher and eventually filter into broader price measures if sustained.

Broader economic activity indicators delivered mixed but generally stable signals. Personal spending and income both rose modestly during the month, reflecting continued consumer resilience, though the second estimate of fourth-quarter GDP was revised lower, pointing to softer contributions from consumption. Other indicators reinforced the theme of moderating but still positive growth. Durable goods orders were flat, while the housing market showed tentative improvement, with existing home sales rising modestly and affordability improving. Even so, overall housing demand remains subdued, as still-elevated mortgage rates and a persistent mismatch between housing supply and buyer demand remain headwinds for activity.

Labor market indicators remained relatively stable. Initial jobless claims came in slightly below expectations, while continuing claims rose modestly but remain within historically normal ranges. Encouragingly, the JOLTS report showed job openings increasing to roughly 6.9 million, with particularly strong gains in finance and insurance. The hiring rate remained stable, while the layoff and discharge rate declined modestly.

Taken together, the data suggest that economic momentum is slowing but remains intact. However, the outlook remains fluid, as a prolonged or escalating conflict involving Iran could materially alter this balance by pushing energy prices higher and complicating the inflation and growth trajectory.

Policy

Policy developments, both geopolitical and monetary, remain central to the market outlook. On the trade front, the Treasury Department launched new Section 301(b) investigations into roughly 60 countries regarding forced labor practices. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer are scheduled to meet counterparts in Paris ahead of a widely anticipated meeting between President Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping, suggesting that trade policy may soon re-enter the forefront of the global economic agenda.

Meanwhile, tensions surrounding the Federal Reserve’s leadership continued to draw attention. A federal judge threw out subpoenas issued by federal prosecutors to Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, ruling that the case appeared motivated by retaliation rather than credible allegations of wrongdoing. The decision drew bipartisan commentary supporting the Federal Reserve’s independence. U.S. District Attorney Jeanine Pirro has indicated she intends to appeal the ruling, raising the possibility that the dispute could eventually reach the Supreme Court. Political ramifications could extend to the confirmation process for former Fed Governor Kevin Warsh.

Attention now turns to the Federal Reserve’s upcoming Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting, scheduled to conclude on Wednesday. The Fed is widely expected to leave the federal funds rate unchanged in the current 3.50%–3.75% range. However, the meeting may reveal internal divisions, with the possibility of several dissents favoring immediate rate cuts. Chair Powell is widely expected to maintain a cautious tone in his post-meeting press conference, emphasizing the considerable uncertainty surrounding both inflation and growth. While he will likely acknowledge the inflationary risks associated with an energy price shock, the Fed is expected to remain balanced in its assessment of the broader economic outlook.

Market pricing has shifted notably in recent weeks, with federal funds futures now suggesting the next rate cut will not occur until mid-2027, a sharp reversal from earlier expectations that the Fed might deliver multiple cuts next year. Much of this repricing reflects concerns that sustained energy price increases tied to the Iran conflict could complicate the inflation outlook.

Conclusion

Energy markets have become the primary macro driver in the current environment. Oil prices, currently near $100 per barrel, are shaping both inflation expectations and global risk sentiment. Historically, sustained prices in the $120 to $130 range have represented a significant pain point for the global economy, making the recent retreat in prices an important stabilizing factor. Financial markets appear to be stabilizing in early trading this week, but investor sentiment remains highly sensitive to developments in the Middle East and the security of global energy infrastructure.

The broader macro picture remains defined by a tension between moderating economic growth and the potential for renewed inflationary pressures. Rising energy costs could complicate the disinflation process even as several economic indicators point to a gradual cooling in activity. Policy uncertainty adds another layer of complexity. Central banks and governments may face difficult decisions if energy-driven inflation persists while economic growth slows.

For now, markets appear to be absorbing a substantial geopolitical shock without a fundamental break in economic conditions. However, the near-term outlook is likely to include continued volatility as investors assess the duration of the conflict and its potential implications for inflation, monetary policy, and global growth.

I. Front End Disclosure

The information provided here is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered an individualized recommendation or personalized investment advice. No part of this material may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without the express written permission of 1919 Investment Counsel, LLC (“1919”). This material contains statements of opinion and belief. Any views expressed herein are those of 1919 as of the date indicated, are based on information available to 1919 as of such date, and are subject to change, without notice, based on market and other conditions. There is no guarantee that the trends discussed herein will continue, or that forward-looking statements and forecasts will materialize.

Statements concerning financial market trends or portfolio strategies are based on current market conditions, which will fluctuate. There is no guarantee that these investment strategies will work under all market conditions or are appropriate for all clients and each client should consider their ability to invest for the long term, especially during periods of downturn in the market. No representation is being made that any account, product, or strategy will or is likely to achieve profits, losses, or results similar to those shown.

All investments carry a degree of risk and there is no guarantee that investment objectives will be achieved.

This material has not been reviewed or endorsed by regulatory agencies. Third party information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but not guaranteed.

There is no guarantee that employees named herein will remain employed by 1919 for the duration of any investment advisory services arrangement.

1919 Investment Counsel, LLC is a registered investment advisor with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. 1919 Investment Counsel, LLC, a subsidiary of Stifel Financial Corp., is a trademark in the United States. 1919 Investment Counsel, LLC, One South Street, Suite 2500, Baltimore, MD 21202. ©2026, 1919 Investment Counsel, LLC. MM-00002343

II. Investment Analysis

The information shown herein is for illustrative purposes. 1919 may consider additional factors not listed here or consider some, but not all, of the factors listed here as appropriate for the strategy’s objectives.

There is no guarantee that desired objectives will be achieved. 1919 has a reasonable belief that any third party information used for investment analyses purposes is reliable but does not represent to the complete accuracy of such information by any third party.

III. Portfolio Composition

For illustrative purposes. There is no guarantee that the portfolio composition for the strategy discussed herein will be comparable to the portfolio shown here.