Cooling Data Reshapes the Rate Outlook

August 17, 2026

Executive Summary

Softer labor, inflation, and retail sales data have reduced expectations for a near-term federal funds rate increase, even as the Fed’s balance-sheet shift reinforces that policymakers are not yet prepared to declare the inflation fight complete. The result is a more balanced but still complex backdrop, with markets weighing softer domestic growth against persistent fiscal, inflation, and geopolitical risks.

Key Takeaways:

• U.S. equities advanced for a third consecutive week, with broader market participation remaining constructive as the equal-weighted S&P 500 and small caps outperformed.
• Softer CPI, PPI, and retail sales data reduced expectations for Federal Reserve tightening, pushing short-term yields lower.
• Longer-term Treasury yields remained elevated amid heavy government and corporate borrowing, including significant AI-related bond issuance.
• Consumer demand is showing signs of moderation, raising an important question over whether spending is normalizing after a strong first half or entering a more persistent slowdown.
• The Federal Reserve’s decision to end Reserve Management Purchases represents a modestly hawkish balance-sheet shift and signals that policymakers may increasingly rely on tools beyond interest rates to influence financial conditions.

Financial Markets

U.S. equity markets finished higher last week, with the cap-weighted S&P 500, NASDAQ Composite, and small-cap S&P 600 all posting a third week of gains. Encouragingly, performance beneath the surface was stronger, with the equal-weighted S&P 500 and small caps outperforming for the week.

Fixed-income markets told a more complicated story. The Treasury yield curve steepened as short-term rates declined while longer-term yields moved higher. Softer July CPI and PPI data, along with weaker retail sales, reinforced the disinflation narrative and reduced expectations for Federal Reserve tightening, with the implied probability of a 25-basis-point September hike falling to 30% from 50% earlier in the week. Longer-term yields moved in the opposite direction as investors remained focused on heavy financing needs. The latest 30-year Treasury auction carried the highest borrowing cost since 2001, while investment-grade corporate issuance has approached $1.5 trillion this year, up 36% from a year ago, including about $200 billion from large technology companies funding AI-related investment. The yield curve, therefore, continues to reflect two competing forces: softer economic data are pulling policy expectations lower at the front end, while fiscal supply, corporate borrowing, inflation uncertainty, and geopolitical energy risks are keeping longer-term yields elevated.

Investor attention now turns to retail sector earnings this week. Recent commentary from Visa, Mastercard, and the major banks has supported the broader consumer-resilience narrative and pushed back against concerns that spending strength is confined exclusively to higher-income households. Still, July’s weaker retail sales report raised questions about whether consumer momentum is beginning to soften as the effects of unusually large tax refunds fade. Retailer results and management guidance should provide an important real-time assessment of household demand.

Economics

July inflation data were broadly consistent with expectations and reinforced the view that underlying price pressures remain contained. Core CPI rose 0.2% month over month and 2.5% year over year, while headline CPI increased 0.1% and 3.4%, respectively. Shelter accounted for most of the monthly increase, while energy prices declined for a second consecutive month. Producer prices were similarly encouraging on the surface, with final-demand PPI unchanged and below expectations. However, upstream price pressures still bear watching, as the degree to which they ultimately reach consumers will depend heavily on demand. Past episodes show that producer-price increases have generated limited pass-through when demand was weak, but much more when economic activity was robust.

Other data pointed to a gradually cooling economy rather than a sharp deterioration. Small-business optimism improved to its highest level since August 2025, supported by stronger hiring plans and easing inflation concerns, although sales expectations weakened and private hiring continued to decelerate. The clearest sign of softer demand came from July retail sales, with headline, core, and control-group sales all declining more than expected. Some weakness reflected the effects of Prime Day timing, but fading support from outsized tax refunds and elevated energy costs may also be weighing on households. The key question is whether consumer spending is simply normalizing after a strong first half or entering a more persistent slowdown, a distinction that will be important for both the Federal Reserve outlook and second-half corporate earnings.

Policy

The Federal Reserve added another dimension to the policy outlook last week by announcing that its balance-sheet expansion program is ending for the time being. Since December, the Fed has been purchasing Treasury bills through its Reserve Management Purchase program to maintain sufficient reserves in the banking system and support smooth functioning in short-term funding markets. While these purchases were designed primarily as a technical reserve-management tool rather than as a change in monetary policy stance, their practical effect was to add liquidity to the financial system and help markets absorb Treasury issuance.

The decision is noteworthy because balance-sheet expansion had increasingly seemed difficult to reconcile with the Federal Reserve’s simultaneous debate over whether near-term interest-rate increases might be necessary to contain inflation. Chair Kevin Warsh has emphasized that interest rates are not the Fed’s only tool for influencing financial conditions, and the end of Reserve Management Purchases reinforces that message. Some market participants had expected the Treasury Department to facilitate the transition by investing a portion of its General Account in the repo market, which would have added reserves and offset some of the tightening from reduced Fed purchases. Treasury declined to make that change in its latest Quarterly Refunding announcement, yet the Fed ended the program nonetheless.

The direct liquidity impact is modest, but the signal may be more important than the dollar amount involved. The decision can be interpreted as a modestly hawkish shift in balance-sheet policy and suggests that the Fed may be increasingly willing to allow its balance sheet to play a more active role in tightening financial conditions.

Conclusion

The economic data increasingly point toward softer demand without a renewed acceleration in underlying inflation. Combined with July’s payroll contraction, cooler CPI and PPI readings, and weaker retail sales, these developments have materially reduced expectations for a near-term Federal Reserve rate increase. At the same time, the Federal Reserve’s balance-sheet shift suggests policymakers are not yet prepared to declare the inflation fight complete.

The bond market captures this tension particularly well. Short-term yields are responding to softer domestic data and reduced expectations for Federal Reserve tightening. In contrast, longer-term yields remain elevated as investors weigh fiscal borrowing needs, unprecedented corporate issuance tied to the AI investment boom, inflation uncertainty, and geopolitical energy risk.

The largest counterweight to the softer domestic data remains the potential for another Middle East energy shock. The principal tension is therefore clear: the U.S. economy is cooling enough to restrain near-term rate expectations, but geopolitical and longer-term inflation risks limit how dovish markets can become.

I. Front End Disclosure

The information provided here is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered an individualized recommendation or personalized investment advice. No part of this material may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without the express written permission of 1919 Investment Counsel, LLC (“1919”). This material contains statements of opinion and belief. Any views expressed herein are those of 1919 as of the date indicated, are based on information available to 1919 as of such date, and are subject to change, without notice, based on market and other conditions. There is no guarantee that the trends discussed herein will continue, or that forward-looking statements and forecasts will materialize.

Statements concerning financial market trends or portfolio strategies are based on current market conditions, which will fluctuate. There is no guarantee that these investment strategies will work under all market conditions or are appropriate for all clients and each client should consider their ability to invest for the long term, especially during periods of downturn in the market. No representation is being made that any account, product, or strategy will or is likely to achieve profits, losses, or results similar to those shown.

All investments carry a degree of risk and there is no guarantee that investment objectives will be achieved. Information provided herein should not be relied upon as investment advice or a recommendation of any particular security.

This material has not been reviewed or endorsed by regulatory agencies. Third party information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but not guaranteed.

There is no guarantee that employees named herein will remain employed by 1919 for the duration of any investment advisory services arrangement.

1919 Investment Counsel, LLC is a registered investment advisor with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. 1919 Investment Counsel, LLC, a subsidiary of Stifel Financial Corp., is a trademark in the United States. 1919 Investment Counsel, LLC, One South Street, Suite 2500, Baltimore, MD 21202. ©2026, 1919 Investment Counsel, LLC. MM-00002634

II. Investment Analysis

The information shown herein is for illustrative purposes. 1919 may consider additional factors not listed here or consider some, but not all, of the factors listed here as appropriate for the strategy’s objectives.

There is no guarantee that desired objectives will be achieved. 1919 has a reasonable belief that any third party information used for investment analyses purposes is reliable but does not represent to the complete accuracy of such information by any third party.

III. Portfolio Composition

For illustrative purposes. There is no guarantee that the portfolio composition for the strategy discussed herein will be comparable to the portfolio shown here.