Market Rotation Accelerates as AI Scrutiny and Fed Uncertainty Persist

Executive Summary

Financial markets remain supported by resilient economic growth, healthy corporate earnings, and continued AI-related investment, even as weakness in large-cap technology stocks and elevated valuations create a more selective environment. Encouragingly, improving equity-market breadth suggests investors are rotating toward a broader range of opportunities rather than abandoning equities. However, persistent inflation, the possibility of additional Federal Reserve tightening, and unresolved geopolitical tensions continue to present meaningful risks, reinforcing the importance of diversification, quality, and valuation discipline.

Key Takeaways:

• Market leadership continues to broaden. The equal-weighted S&P 500 gained 5.0% in October while the capitalization-weighted index declined 0.87%, highlighting a significant rotation away from mega-cap technology and AI-related companies toward a broader range of stocks.
• AI demand remains strong, but investors are becoming more discerning. Recent technology earnings reinforced robust infrastructure investment while raising concerns about elevated capital expenditures, pressure on free cash flow, and whether substantial spending will translate into sustainable profitability.
• Economic growth remains resilient but increasingly uneven. Third-quarter GDP expanded at a 3.4% annualized rate, supported by strong business investment, while moderating consumer spending, slowing hiring, and core PCE inflation of 3.1% point to emerging challenges.
• The Federal Reserve remains inclined to tighten further. Policymakers held rates steady in October, but two hawkish dissents and persistent inflationary pressures suggest the pause may be temporary, with markets pricing in a greater-than-75 % probability of a December rate increase.
• Political and geopolitical uncertainty remain important risks. Historically favorable post-midterm-election seasonality offers some encouragement, while renewed U.S.–Iran diplomacy could ease energy-related inflationary pressures. However, the possibility of renewed conflict, elevated interest rates, and continued scrutiny of AI valuations leave markets vulnerable to volatility.

Financial Markets

U.S. equity markets finished last week mixed, with headline index performance masking a significant improvement in market breadth. Both the equal-weighted S&P 500 and Small Cap S&P 600 significantly outperformed the cap-weighted S&P 500 and tech-heavy NASDAQ. Importantly, the strength in smaller companies and the average S&P 500 constituent suggests investors continue to rotate away from a relatively narrow group of mega-cap technology leaders rather than broadly reducing equity exposure.

This rotation became particularly pronounced late in the week. On Thursday, the equal-weighted S&P 500 outperformed its capitalization-weighted counterpart by more than 150 basis points, reversing much of its relative underperformance over the week’s previous sessions. The trend continued Friday, with another 140-basis-point advantage. For October as a whole, the equal-weighted S&P 500 gained 5.0%, compared with a 0.87% decline for the capitalization-weighted index. This nearly six-percentage-point divergence is especially noteworthy following several years of concentrated leadership. Rather than indicating a broad deterioration in investor sentiment, the market appears to be rewarding companies with more attractive valuations, durable earnings, and greater visibility into near-term cash flows.

Artificial intelligence remained at the center of this shift. AI-related shares rebounded during the first half of the week before coming under renewed pressure following earnings announcements from Alphabet, Amazon, Microsoft, Intel, and other technology companies. Importantly, the fundamental message surrounding AI infrastructure demand remained largely positive. Major cloud providers continue to emphasize substantial computing requirements and sustained investment in data centers, semiconductors, and related infrastructure. However, investors are increasingly focused on the financial implications of those commitments, particularly the pressure elevated capital expenditures place on free cash flow and the timing of future investment returns. Growing scrutiny of non-AI business segments has added another dimension, as investors evaluate whether existing operations can generate sufficient cash flow to support increasingly ambitious investment plans. The distinction remains important: underlying AI demand appears robust, but strong demand alone may no longer be sufficient to justify elevated valuations.

Fixed-income markets offered an additional perspective on changing investor sentiment. The 10-year Treasury yield declined from 5.0% to 4.93% during the week and is trading near 4.88% this morning, roughly 40 basis points below its October high of 5.31%. Lower yields can support equity valuations by reducing borrowing costs and the discount rate applied to future earnings. However, the interpretation is not entirely straightforward. Falling yields may reflect improving inflation expectations, but they can also signal growing concerns about economic growth and future returns on corporate investment. Friday’s simultaneous declines in equities and Treasury yields suggest some of the recent bond rally reflects defensive demand rather than simply greater confidence in disinflation.

Economics

Recent economic data continue to point to a resilient but increasingly uneven U.S. economy. The advance estimate of third-quarter GDP showed growth accelerating to a 3.4% annualized rate, above expectations of 3.2% and the second quarter’s 2.2% pace. Consumer spending and business investment were important contributors, with continued strength in AI-related capital expenditures supporting economic activity. Core capital goods shipments rose 1.2% in September, exceeding expectations and reinforcing the durability of business investment despite elevated borrowing costs. Inflation, however, remains a challenge. September’s core Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) Price Index rose 0.3% month over month, in line with expectations, while the annual rate accelerated to 3.1% from 3.0%, remaining meaningfully above the Federal Reserve’s 2% target. Headline PCE increased 0.5%, its largest monthly gain since April. At the same time, personal spending growth slowed to 0.5% from 0.9% in August, while personal income increased by just 0.2%. With consumer prices rising at roughly the same pace as nominal spending, real consumption was essentially flat in September, suggesting household demand may be moderating despite strong headline GDP growth.

Labor market conditions remain stable, although hiring momentum continues to soften. Initial jobless claims declined to 194,000, while continuing claims fell to approximately 1.70 million, reinforcing that layoffs remain historically subdued. However, ADP’s higher-frequency payroll estimates showed private-sector hiring decelerating for a second consecutive week, averaging roughly 16,750 jobs per week over the past month. These trends remain consistent with the “low-hiring, low-firing” labor market that has characterized much of this expansion. Consumer confidence provided a more encouraging signal, with the Conference Board’s index rising sharply to 91.7 in October from 84.2 in September, well above expectations. Perceptions of labor market conditions improved, although plans for spending on durable goods and services weakened, suggesting households remain cautious amid elevated prices and borrowing costs. Year-ahead inflation expectations declined but remained high at 5.8%. Taken together, the data suggest the expansion remains intact, supported by strong business investment and limited layoffs, but moderating consumer demand and persistent inflation could increasingly constrain growth. Friday’s October employment report will provide an important indicator of whether hiring is stabilizing or weakening further.

Policy

The Federal Reserve’s October meeting reinforced the delicate balance between resilient economic growth and persistent inflation pressures. As expected, policymakers held the federal funds target range unchanged at 3.75%–4.00%, following September’s 25-basis-point increase. However, Governor Lisa Cook and Cleveland Fed President Beth Hammack dissented in favor of another hike, suggesting concerns about persistent inflation and repeated supply shocks may be spreading within the Committee. The policy statement also leaned modestly hawkish, upgrading the assessment of economic activity from “solid” to “strong” while continuing to describe inflation as elevated. Notably, the Fed removed September’s language emphasizing a timelier return to 2% inflation, instead stressing the need to gather more information before determining the appropriate policy stance. During his press conference, Chair Kevin Warsh outlined plans to revise the FOMC’s meeting schedule beginning in 2027, including fewer formal rate-setting meetings, while confirming that reviews of the Fed’s communications, balance sheet, inflation measurement, and broader policy framework remain underway. Taken together, the October decision appears more consistent with a temporary pause than a sustained hold. Federal funds futures currently imply a probability slightly above 75% of a December rate increase.

Political uncertainty also remains in focus as Americans head to the polls for Tuesday’s midterm elections. Historically, midterm election years have been associated with elevated volatility, with the S&P 500 averaging an intra-year decline of about 19%. This year has been considerably more contained despite higher interest rates, elevated energy prices, and geopolitical uncertainty. Encouragingly, since WWII, the S&P 500 or equivalent has never declined in the 12 months following a midterm election. Election outcomes could influence the outlook for fiscal policy, taxation, regulation, and government spending, with divided government potentially limiting the scope for major legislative changes. However, the more consequential market drivers remain corporate earnings, inflation, monetary policy, and geopolitics. In particular, renewed diplomatic efforts between the United States and Iran could lower energy prices and ease inflation pressures, while renewed military escalation could quickly reverse those benefits. With AI-related valuation concerns, the possibility of further Federal Reserve tightening, and unresolved tensions in the Middle East, investors should remain prepared for volatility, even as historical post-election seasonality offers a constructive perspective.

Conclusion

The past week reinforced an important distinction in the current investment environment: weakness in large-cap technology and AI-related companies does not necessarily signal a broader deterioration in equity-market fundamentals. October’s substantial outperformance by the equal-weighted S&P 500 and continued strength in small-cap stocks suggest investors are rotating toward a broader range of opportunities rather than abandoning equities. Importantly, the AI investment cycle remains intact, with robust infrastructure demand and capital spending supporting economic growth and corporate earnings. However, investors are becoming increasingly discerning about valuations, financing requirements, free cash flow, and the ability to translate substantial investment into sustainable profitability. The broader economy also remains resilient, supported by strong third-quarter GDP growth, healthy business investment, and limited layoffs. Nevertheless, moderating consumer spending, persistent inflation, and the possibility of additional Federal Reserve tightening present meaningful challenges. Renewed diplomatic efforts with Iran could ease energy-related inflation pressures, although geopolitical uncertainty remains a major source of volatility.

For long-term investors, the outlook remains constructive but increasingly selective. Positive economic growth, healthy corporate earnings, and improving market breadth continue to support equity exposure, while elevated valuations and concentration risks reinforce the importance of diversification and disciplined valuation focus. High-quality fixed income also offers attractive nominal yields and valuable diversification during equity-market drawdowns, although persistent inflation remains a risk for longer-duration bonds. As markets navigate shifting leadership, restrictive monetary policy, and geopolitical uncertainty, maintaining balanced portfolios focused on quality, durable profitability, and long-term fundamentals remains the most prudent approach.

I. Front End Disclosure

The information provided here is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered an individualized recommendation or personalized investment advice. No part of this material may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without the express written permission of 1919 Investment Counsel, LLC (“1919”). This material contains statements of opinion and belief. Any views expressed herein are those of 1919 as of the date indicated, are based on information available to 1919 as of such date, and are subject to change, without notice, based on market and other conditions. There is no guarantee that the trends discussed herein will continue, or that forward-looking statements and forecasts will materialize.

Statements concerning financial market trends or portfolio strategies are based on current market conditions, which will fluctuate. There is no guarantee that these investment strategies will work under all market conditions or are appropriate for all clients and each client should consider their ability to invest for the long term, especially during periods of downturn in the market. No representation is being made that any account, product, or strategy will or is likely to achieve profits, losses, or results similar to those shown.

All investments carry a degree of risk and there is no guarantee that investment objectives will be achieved. Information provided herein should not be relied upon as investment advice or a recommendation of any particular security.

This material has not been reviewed or endorsed by regulatory agencies. Third party information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but not guaranteed.

There is no guarantee that employees named herein will remain employed by 1919 for the duration of any investment advisory services arrangement.

1919 Investment Counsel, LLC is a registered investment advisor with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. 1919 Investment Counsel, LLC, a subsidiary of Stifel Financial Corp., is a trademark in the United States. 1919 Investment Counsel, LLC, One South Street, Suite 2500, Baltimore, MD 21202. ©2026, 1919 Investment Counsel, LLC. MM-00002776

II. Investment Analysis

The information shown herein is for illustrative purposes. 1919 may consider additional factors not listed here or consider some, but not all, of the factors listed here as appropriate for the strategy’s objectives.

There is no guarantee that desired objectives will be achieved. 1919 has a reasonable belief that any third party information used for investment analyses purposes is reliable but does not represent to the complete accuracy of such information by any third party.

III. Portfolio Composition

For illustrative purposes. There is no guarantee that the portfolio composition for the strategy discussed herein will be comparable to the portfolio shown here.