Ceasefire Optimism Fades as Geopolitical Risk Reasserts Itself

April 13, 2026

Executive Summary

Markets remain highly sensitive to geopolitical developments, with last week’s ceasefire-driven rally quickly reversing as tensions between the United States and Iran resurfaced. Energy markets continue to anchor the macro narrative, with oil volatility reinforcing inflation risks and complicating the policy outlook. While underlying economic conditions remain stable, signs of softening in consumer sentiment and income trends suggest resilience is beginning to erode at the margin.

The absence of a clear diplomatic resolution, combined with escalating policy actions such as the U.S. blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, has reintroduced uncertainty and elevated the risk of further volatility. As the earnings reporting season begins, investor focus will shift to management’s comments and guidance to gain insight into how firms are navigating this increasingly complex environment.

Key Takeaways:

• Geopolitics Driving Markets: A ceasefire rally reversed as failed negotiations and renewed tensions reintroduced a risk-off tone.
• Energy Remains the Key Variable: Oil volatility above $100 per barrel is reinforcing inflation risks and shaping market sentiment.
• Economic Momentum Moderating: Growth remains positive, but weakening sentiment and income trends signal emerging softness.
• Policy Risks Elevated: The U.S. blockade and lack of diplomatic progress increase the risk of re-escalation and sustained volatility.
• Earnings Season in Focus: Corporate guidance will be critical in assessing the real economic impact of geopolitical instability.

Financial Markets

U.S. equity markets experienced a sharp, ceasefire-driven rally early in the week, as investors responded to signs of de-escalation in the Iran conflict. However, that optimism proved short-lived. As the week progressed, and particularly into the weekend, unresolved tensions and failed diplomatic efforts quickly reintroduced a risk-off tone, underscoring how sensitive markets remain to geopolitical developments.

Negotiations between U.S. and Iranian delegations in Islamabad ended without a breakthrough, and subsequent policy actions further complicated the outlook. President Trump’s announcement of a U.S. naval blockade in the Strait of Hormuz, combined with increasingly firm Iranian responses, has called the durability of the two-week ceasefire into question. While the ceasefire technically remains in place as of this writing, markets have begun the week on a weaker footing, reflecting renewed concerns about escalation.

Looking ahead, the first-quarter earnings season begins this week with major banks reporting results. While fundamentals remain broadly stable with S&P 500 EPS growth forecast at 12.6% for the first quarter, investor focus will be squarely on forward guidance, particularly any commentary regarding the impact of geopolitical instability, higher energy costs, and evolving financial conditions. As in prior periods of uncertainty, earnings clarity may either reinforce resilience or expose emerging cracks in corporate outlooks.

Economics

This week’s inflation data delivered a nuanced message: underlying price pressures remain relatively contained, even as headline figures reflect the immediate impact of energy shocks. March core CPI (excluding food & energy) rose 0.2% month over month, slightly below expectations, while the year-over-year pace was 2.6%, indicating that core services and shelter inflation continue to follow a gradual, more constructive path. In contrast, headline CPI surged 0.9% on the month, driven by a sharp increase in energy prices, highlighting the growing influence of geopolitical developments on near-term inflation dynamics. Importantly, much of the data likely predates the full impact of recent energy volatility, leaving inflation risks skewed to the upside if elevated oil prices persist.

Beyond inflation, recent data point to a modest softening in economic momentum. Personal income unexpectedly declined in February while spending held steady, suggesting consumers may be increasingly reliant on savings or credit to sustain activity. At the same time, initial jobless claims edged higher, signaling early signs of labor market softening, though overall conditions remain consistent with a “low-hire, low-fire” environment.

Consumer sentiment deteriorated sharply, with the University of Michigan’s preliminary April reading falling to a record low amid broad-based declines in expectations for both business conditions and personal finances. Short-term inflation expectations also rose, reflecting the clear impact of rising energy prices. Taken together, the data suggest the economy continues to expand but at a moderating pace, with resilience gradually eroding at the margins. This softer backdrop is further reinforced by the downward revision to fourth-quarter GDP, underscoring that growth had already been slowing before the recent geopolitical escalation.

Policy

Policy developments remain the dominant driver of market direction and macroeconomic risk, with diplomatic efforts between the United States and Iran failing to produce a meaningful agreement. The lack of progress reflects a fundamental misalignment in negotiating positions, as both sides appear to believe they retain strategic leverage. While the six-week conflict has significantly degraded Iran’s military infrastructure, key objectives, particularly around nuclear capabilities and regional deterrence, remain unresolved, leaving the broader strategic outlook uncertain.

This uncertainty is compounded by Iran’s remaining asymmetric capabilities, including missile systems and the ability to disrupt shipping in the Strait of Hormuz. The U.S. decision to implement a naval blockade marks a notable escalation in economic pressure, given the Strait’s critical role in global energy flows. However, questions remain about the feasibility of enforcing such a blockade, particularly as Iran retains the means to disrupt maritime traffic.

Importantly, the breakdown in negotiations does not necessarily signal imminent escalation, as both sides appear to be using the ceasefire period to regroup. Nevertheless, the absence of a clear diplomatic path keeps the risk of renewed conflict elevated. From a market perspective, energy remains the central concern. While some stabilization has emerged through continued flows and alternative supply routes, a prolonged disruption in the Strait would likely push oil prices higher, reinforcing inflation pressures and further constraining the Federal Reserve’s already limited policy flexibility.

Conclusion

This week encapsulated the increasingly headline-driven nature of markets. A ceasefire sparked a sharp relief rally, but the absence of a durable diplomatic resolution quickly brought volatility back to the forefront.

The weekend’s developments mark a clear re-escalation in risk. Failed negotiations, a U.S. blockade, and renewed volatility in the energy market have shifted the narrative back toward uncertainty. Encouragingly, the broader economic foundation remains intact. Inflation outside of energy is moderating, labor markets are softening gradually rather than abruptly, and corporate earnings have thus far remained resilient. However, the margin for error is narrowing.

In the near term, energy prices and geopolitical developments will remain the primary drivers of market direction. In this environment, volatility is likely to persist, and investor sentiment will remain highly sensitive to headlines. Corporate earnings reports and related management comments will offer important insights into key topics, including consumer behavior, price pressures, and credit conditions. A disciplined approach grounded in diversification, quality, and long-term perspective remains essential as markets navigate an increasingly uncertain landscape.

I. Front End Disclosure

The information provided here is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered an individualized recommendation or personalized investment advice. No part of this material may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without the express written permission of 1919 Investment Counsel, LLC (“1919”). This material contains statements of opinion and belief. Any views expressed herein are those of 1919 as of the date indicated, are based on information available to 1919 as of such date, and are subject to change, without notice, based on market and other conditions. There is no guarantee that the trends discussed herein will continue, or that forward-looking statements and forecasts will materialize.

Statements concerning financial market trends or portfolio strategies are based on current market conditions, which will fluctuate. There is no guarantee that these investment strategies will work under all market conditions or are appropriate for all clients and each client should consider their ability to invest for the long term, especially during periods of downturn in the market. No representation is being made that any account, product, or strategy will or is likely to achieve profits, losses, or results similar to those shown.

All investments carry a degree of risk and there is no guarantee that investment objectives will be achieved.

This material has not been reviewed or endorsed by regulatory agencies. Third party information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but not guaranteed.

There is no guarantee that employees named herein will remain employed by 1919 for the duration of any investment advisory services arrangement.

1919 Investment Counsel, LLC is a registered investment advisor with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. 1919 Investment Counsel, LLC, a subsidiary of Stifel Financial Corp., is a trademark in the United States. 1919 Investment Counsel, LLC, One South Street, Suite 2500, Baltimore, MD 21202. ©2026, 1919 Investment Counsel, LLC. MM-00002386

II. Investment Analysis

The information shown herein is for illustrative purposes. 1919 may consider additional factors not listed here or consider some, but not all, of the factors listed here as appropriate for the strategy’s objectives.

There is no guarantee that desired objectives will be achieved. 1919 has a reasonable belief that any third party information used for investment analyses purposes is reliable but does not represent to the complete accuracy of such information by any third party.

III. Portfolio Composition

For illustrative purposes. There is no guarantee that the portfolio composition for the strategy discussed herein will be comparable to the portfolio shown here.